Skip to main content

Acceptance Criteria vs Definition of Done

Definition of Done (DoD) is a list of requirements that a user story must adhere to for the team to call it complete.

While the Acceptance Criteria of a User Story consist of set of Test Scenarios that are to be met to confirm that the software is working as expected.

Acceptance criteria:

 Acceptance criteria or  Acceptance scenarios are an integral part of a story.

The  acceptance tests define what actually has to be built to implement a story.

There is no allocated responsibility for writing acceptance criteria.

While it is usually the product owner or product manager who gets around to defining the functionality, just about anyone on the team could write acceptance criteria for user stories.

The writer must be careful to ensure that the acceptance criteria are written from the perspective of the end user, and for this reason the product owner (who is considered to be the voice of the customer) often undertakes this task. 

The acceptance criteria written in this format Given - When - Then

Given - some initial context

When - an event occurs

Then - ensure some outcomes

The example for the acceptance criteria given below for the user story, "Customer withdraws cash from ATM:

User story:

As a customer

I want to withdraw cash from ATM,

So that i don't have to wait at the bank.

Acceptance criteria for the above user story:

Positive scenario:

Given the account is in credit

and the card is valid

and the dispenser account contains cash

When the customer requests cash

Then ensure the account is debited

and ensure cash is dispensed

and ensure the card is retuned

Negative scenario:

Given the account is in overdrawn

and the card is valid

When the customer requests cash

Then ensure a rejection message is displayed

and ensure cash is not dispensed

and ensure the card is retuned

Definition of Done:

The definition of Done is structured as a list of items, each one used to validate a Story, which exists to ensure that the Development Team agree about the quality of work they’re attempting to produce.

It serves as a checklist that is used to check each Product Backlog Item or User Story for completeness. Items in the definition of “Done” are intended to be applicable to all items in the Product Backlog, 

For example, in the software industry, teams may need to ask some of the following questions to come up with their DoD:

  • Code peer reviewed?
  • Code completed?
  • Code reviewed?
  • Code checked-in?
  • Unit tests passed?
  • Functional tests passed?
  • Acceptance tests completed?
  • Product Owner reviewed and accepted?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) - Module 5 - Architecture Frameworks

Architecture Frameworks: An Architecture Framework is a theoretical structure that has the purpose of developing, executing, and maintaining an Enterprise Architecture. Advantages of EA framework: Simplify Breaks down areas of the business process Organise business components and create and identify relationships between business Determine the scope Customization in the existing framework Disadvantages of EA framework: Need to follow process Provides only direction and not information It's based on goal and objective Need creativity and proactive thinking Zachman Framework: The Zachman Framework is a widely used model in Enterprise Architecture (EA) that provides a structured way to classify and organize an organization's information infrastructure by defining different perspectives from various stakeholders, allowing for a holistic view of the enterprise and facilitating alignment between business needs and technology solutions; essentially acting as a template to organize arc...

Daily Agile Scrum stand-up meeting guidelines

Followers of the Scrum method of project management will typically start their day with a " stand-up meeting ". In short, this is a quick daily meeting (30 minutes or less) where the participants share the answers to the three questions with each other: • What did I accomplish yesterday?  • What will I do today?  • What obstacles are impeding my progress?  Some people are talkative and tend to wander off into Story Telling .  Some people want to engage in Problem Solving immediately after hearing a problem. Meetings that take too long tend to have low energy and participants not directly related to a long discussion will tend to be distracted. These are the minimum number of questions that satisfy the goals of daily stand-ups. Other topics of discussion (e.g., design discussions, gossip, etc.) should be deferred until after the meeting.  Here are few tips for running a smooth daily meeting:  • Everyone should literally stand-up and no one should sit down ...

Empiricism (Scrum)

Empiricism asserts that knowledge comes from experience and making decisions based on what is observed. Pillars of  Empiricism . Various practices exist to forecast progress, like burn-downs, burn-ups, or cumulative flows. While proven useful, these do not replace the importance of empiricism . In complex environments, what will happen is unknown. Only what has already happened may be used for forward-looking decision making. Each artifact contains a commitment to ensure it provides information that enhances transparency and focus against which progress can be measured: ● For the Product Backlog it is the Product Goal. ● For the Sprint Backlog it is the Sprint Goal. ● For the Increment it is the Definition of Done. These commitments exist to reinforce empiricism . The sum of the Increments is presented at the Sprint Review thus supporting empiricism .