Skip to main content

New way of product development

Today is the era of fast-paced world and competitive world.

Companies are realizing that the old sequential approach to developing new products won’t get the job done and product can’t be reached to market when compared to competitors.

The 4 stages of product development are as follows – R&D, Growth, Maturation, and Decline.


Instead of sequential approach, companies are using holistic approach – as in rugby game, the ball gets passed within the team as it moves as a unit up the field.

This holistic approach has six characteristics:

1)   Build-in-instability

2)   Self-organizing project teams

3)   Overlapping development phases

4)   Multi-learning

5)   Subtle (very clear and strong) control

6)   Organizational change to explore and learning

The above six characteristics forming a fast and flexible process for new product development with advantage of act as a change agent, creative, market driven ideas, flexible organization.

Many companies accepted importance of high quality, low cost, flexibility to adopt changes and unique product features to excel in today’s competitive market.

In this new approach, the product development process emerges from the constant interaction of hand-picked and multidisciplinary team whose members work together from start to finish.

The product development team engages in iterative experimentation, this goes on in even in the latest phases of development process to adopt to today’s competitive market.

This approach is essential for companies seeking to develop new products quickly and flexibly.

One more important note is the products are developed by multiple teams by the multiple software development vendors for the product company.

Few of the companies adapted to the new product development process are Xerox, Canon, Honda, Epson, HP, 3M.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a set of organizational and workflow patterns for implementing agile practices at an enterprise scale. The framework is a body of knowledge that includes structured guidance on roles and responsibilities, how to plan and manage the work, and values to uphold. Scrum is a simple, flexible approach to adopting Agile that's great for small teams. SAFe is an enterprise-wide Agile framework designed to help bring Agile beyond the team and into the company as a whole. Scaled Agile has built a comprehensive level that includes all the four layers called the team, program, large solutions, and portfolio level. 4 Layers: Portfolio - Strategy, Vision, Roadmap, Strategy goal, Decision making, Budget, Portfolio level metrics,  Program - Align multiple teams towards a common mission, Bring together all the Agile teams, transparency, collaboration, and synchronisation, Scrum of Scrums, Product Owners to define the overall vision. Large Solutions - archite

Risk Register

A project risk register is a tool project managers use to track and monitor any risks that might impact their projects. Risk management is a vital component of project management because it's how you proactively combat potential problems or setbacks. Risk Description Impact Risk Response Risk Level Risk Owner Automation Testing Software licence delay Delay in starting testing and project schedule impact As we have one licence. Planned to start automation testing in 2 shifts. Planned to get one more licence in 2 weeks’ time. High IT team Frequent Disruption in dependency API services Delay in development of integration and unit testing Dependency API service is down, and the team is working on resolving the issue. Continuously working with API team High External Team/ Project Manager There is chance of new requir

Lessons learned from sprint retrospective meeting

Scenario: Team Missed Sprint Goals Challenge: A development team consistently missed its sprint goals, leading to frustration and a drop in morale. Team members felt overwhelmed by the workload and struggled to communicate effectively. Retrospective Insights: During the retrospective, team members openly discussed their challenges and frustrations. They identified bottlenecks in communication, unclear priorities, and unrealistic expectations. The team realized that individual workloads were not evenly distributed, causing burnout for some members. Lessons Learned: Effective Communication Matters: The team recognized the importance of clear communication. They committed to regular stand-up meetings, where everyone shared progress, blockers, and priorities. Balancing Workloads: The retrospective highlighted the need to distribute tasks more evenly. They decided to monitor workloads and adjust assignments accordingly. Setting Realistic Goals: The team acknowledged that setting achievable