Product Manager vs Product Owner

Both the product manager and the product owner work towards a common goal, to build and improve products that create meaningful value for customers and all stakeholders within the company.

This usually happens by delivering and optimizing product features.

Product Manager

Product Owner

The product manager discovers what users need, prioritizes what to build next, and rallies the team around a product roadmap.

The product owner is responsible for maximizing the value of the product by creating and managing the product backlog.

This person creates user stories for the development team and communicates the voice of the customer in the Scrum process.

Product Manager and Product Owner's work on below vacuum.

Product manager focus on:

Business Strategy
Long term Product Vision
Long term Product Strategy
Product Roadmap
Alignment with Product Owner

Product owner focus on:

Release Plan (Product Backlog ie: Epic)
Sprint Plan (Sprint Backlog ie: User Story)
Daily Scrum
Provide feedback to Product Manager

While the product manager has a highly strategic role and is accountable for the whole product lifecycle and customer-facing.

Product manager decides what products to build next.

Product Manager should spend half their time talking to customers, and half working with the product owner.

The role of the product owner entails a more narrow focus and closer work with the development team.

Product owner helps the development team to build the products as per the goal set by the product owner.

Product Owner should spend half their time talking to product manager and customers, and half working with the team.

In many large organizations that follow Scrum, product owners are very much part of the engineering department rather than the product department.

They may be called "product owners" but it might be more accurate to describe them as "product backlog owners" or "product backlog keepers".

In bigger companies, the product manager stands a level higher than the product owner and serves as a connector between the organization and the outside world.

This is why it's sometimes so hard to draw a line between the two positions or jobs.

Comments

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a set of organizational and workflow patterns for implementing agile practices at an enterprise scale. The framework is a body of knowledge that includes structured guidance on roles and responsibilities, how to plan and manage the work, and values to uphold. Scrum is a simple, flexible approach to adopting Agile that's great for small teams. SAFe is an enterprise-wide Agile framework designed to help bring Agile beyond the team and into the company as a whole. Scaled Agile has built a comprehensive level that includes all the four layers called the team, program, large solutions, and portfolio level. 4 Layers: Portfolio - Strategy, Vision, Roadmap, Strategy goal, Decision making, Budget, Portfolio level metrics, Program - Align multiple teams towards a common mission, Bring together all the Agile teams, transparency, collaboration, and synchronisation, Scrum of Scrums, Product Owners to define the overall vision. Large Solutions - archite

Risk Register

A project risk register is a tool project managers use to track and monitor any risks that might impact their projects. Risk management is a vital component of project management because it's how you proactively combat potential problems or setbacks. Risk Description Impact Risk Response Risk Level Risk Owner Automation Testing Software licence delay Delay in starting testing and project schedule impact As we have one licence. Planned to start automation testing in 2 shifts. Planned to get one more licence in 2 weeks’ time. High IT team Frequent Disruption in dependency API services Delay in development of integration and unit testing Dependency API service is down, and the team is working on resolving the issue. Continuously working with API team High External Team/ Project Manager There is chance of new requir

Lessons learned from sprint retrospective meeting

Scenario: Team Missed Sprint Goals Challenge: A development team consistently missed its sprint goals, leading to frustration and a drop in morale. Team members felt overwhelmed by the workload and struggled to communicate effectively. Retrospective Insights: During the retrospective, team members openly discussed their challenges and frustrations. They identified bottlenecks in communication, unclear priorities, and unrealistic expectations. The team realized that individual workloads were not evenly distributed, causing burnout for some members. Lessons Learned: Effective Communication Matters: The team recognized the importance of clear communication. They committed to regular stand-up meetings, where everyone shared progress, blockers, and priorities. Balancing Workloads: The retrospective highlighted the need to distribute tasks more evenly. They decided to monitor workloads and adjust assignments accordingly. Setting Realistic Goals: The team acknowledged that setting achievable

High-Tech Yuga

Search This Blog