Skip to main content

Experience Level Agreement - XLA

 Experience Level Agreement - XLA:

What Is an Experience Level Agreement (XLA)?

  • XLAs are a relatively new approach to service level agreements (SLAs).
  • Unlike traditional SLAs that focus on metrics like response time and availability, XLAs prioritize the customer or employee experience and business impact.
  • While SLAs measure specific processes or activities, XLAs assess the overall impact of customer-facing activities on end-users or their businesses.
  • XLAs aim to answer whether user productivity was enhanced and if the experience improved.

SLAs measure the process or the completing of an objective. XLAs, on the other hand, measure the outcome and the value of the service provided.

Steps to create XLA:

Step 1: Define Clear Objectives

Step 2: Identify Key Customer Touchpoints

Step 3: Define Measurable Metrics (customer satisfaction score /  net promoter score / customer effort score)

Step 4: Establish Baseline Performance

Step 5: Collaborate with Stakeholders

Step 6: Set Attainable Targets

Step 7: Design Rewards and Consequences

Step 8: Monitor and Measure Progress

Step 9: Continuously Improve

Step 10: Communicate and Educate

Customer feedback is the primary measure used in XLAs. That's why most digital service providers will ask for a 1 to 5-star rating at the end of each request or issue: to check the level of customer satisfaction. Other XLA measurements include business metrics that measure outcomes, such as job completion times/rate.

What are some challenges in implementing effective XLAs?

  • Organizations may resist transitioning from traditional Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to XLAs due to familiarity with the former.
  • Ensuring consistent positive experiences across diverse user groups is challenging.
  • Companies worry about how XLAs might affect penalties.
  • Balancing user experience improvements with business impact is crucial.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a set of organizational and workflow patterns for implementing agile practices at an enterprise scale. The framework is a body of knowledge that includes structured guidance on roles and responsibilities, how to plan and manage the work, and values to uphold. Scrum is a simple, flexible approach to adopting Agile that's great for small teams. SAFe is an enterprise-wide Agile framework designed to help bring Agile beyond the team and into the company as a whole. Scaled Agile has built a comprehensive level that includes all the four layers called the team, program, large solutions, and portfolio level. 4 Layers: Portfolio - Strategy, Vision, Roadmap, Strategy goal, Decision making, Budget, Portfolio level metrics,  Program - Align multiple teams towards a common mission, Bring together all the Agile teams, transparency, collaboration, and synchronisation, Scrum of Scrums, Product Owners to define the overall vision. Large Solutions - archite
Post a Comment
Read more

Risk Register

A project risk register is a tool project managers use to track and monitor any risks that might impact their projects. Risk management is a vital component of project management because it's how you proactively combat potential problems or setbacks. Risk Description Impact Risk Response Risk Level Risk Owner Automation Testing Software licence delay Delay in starting testing and project schedule impact As we have one licence. Planned to start automation testing in 2 shifts. Planned to get one more licence in 2 weeks’ time. High IT team Frequent Disruption in dependency API services Delay in development of integration and unit testing Dependency API service is down, and the team is working on resolving the issue. Continuously working with API team High External Team/ Project Manager There is chance of new requir
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons learned from sprint retrospective meeting

Scenario: Team Missed Sprint Goals Challenge: A development team consistently missed its sprint goals, leading to frustration and a drop in morale. Team members felt overwhelmed by the workload and struggled to communicate effectively. Retrospective Insights: During the retrospective, team members openly discussed their challenges and frustrations. They identified bottlenecks in communication, unclear priorities, and unrealistic expectations. The team realized that individual workloads were not evenly distributed, causing burnout for some members. Lessons Learned: Effective Communication Matters: The team recognized the importance of clear communication. They committed to regular stand-up meetings, where everyone shared progress, blockers, and priorities. Balancing Workloads: The retrospective highlighted the need to distribute tasks more evenly. They decided to monitor workloads and adjust assignments accordingly. Setting Realistic Goals: The team acknowledged that setting achievable
Post a Comment
Read more