Residual Risks and Secondary Risks

Residual risk is the level of risk that remains after all possible measures have been taken to mitigate or eliminate a particular risk.

It is the risk that an event will still occur despite the implementation of risk management controls or strategies.

Residual risk example in banking:

Inability to clear debt
Risk of a loan applicant losing their job
Guarantor's refusal or delay to pay

Here are some steps organizations can take to address residual risk:

Identify requirements: Determine relevant governance, risk, and compliance requirements.
Evaluate controls: Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the organization's control framework.
Acknowledge risks: Recognize existing risks.
Define risk appetite: Determine the organization's risk tolerance level.
Implement recovery strategies: Conduct recovery exercises that are realistic and rigorous.
Transfer risk: Shift the potential loss from an adverse outcome to a third party, such as through purchasing insurance.
Accept risk: Accept responsibility for any losses incurred by remaining residual risks.

What Are Secondary Risks?

The PMBOK Guide defines secondary risks as “those risks that arise as a direct outcome of implementing a risk response.” In other words, you identify risk and have a response plan in place to deal with that risk. Once this plan is implemented, the new risk that may arise from the implementation - that’s a secondary risk.

Secondary Risk examples:

Manufacturing company: A company might offer a promotion to attract more customers for a new product, but this could lead to a secondary risk of running out of inventory.
Health insurance policy: The premium payments for a health insurance policy are a secondary risk.

Comments

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) - Module 5 - Architecture Frameworks

Architecture Frameworks: An Architecture Framework is a theoretical structure that has the purpose of developing, executing, and maintaining an Enterprise Architecture. Advantages of EA framework: Simplify Breaks down areas of the business process Organise business components and create and identify relationships between business Determine the scope Customization in the existing framework Disadvantages of EA framework: Need to follow process Provides only direction and not information It's based on goal and objective Need creativity and proactive thinking Zachman Framework: The Zachman Framework is a widely used model in Enterprise Architecture (EA) that provides a structured way to classify and organize an organization's information infrastructure by defining different perspectives from various stakeholders, allowing for a holistic view of the enterprise and facilitating alignment between business needs and technology solutions; essentially acting as a template to organize arc...

Daily Agile Scrum stand-up meeting guidelines

Followers of the Scrum method of project management will typically start their day with a " stand-up meeting ". In short, this is a quick daily meeting (30 minutes or less) where the participants share the answers to the three questions with each other: • What did I accomplish yesterday? • What will I do today? • What obstacles are impeding my progress? Some people are talkative and tend to wander off into Story Telling . Some people want to engage in Problem Solving immediately after hearing a problem. Meetings that take too long tend to have low energy and participants not directly related to a long discussion will tend to be distracted. These are the minimum number of questions that satisfy the goals of daily stand-ups. Other topics of discussion (e.g., design discussions, gossip, etc.) should be deferred until after the meeting. Here are few tips for running a smooth daily meeting: • Everyone should literally stand-up and no one should sit down ...

Empiricism (Scrum)

Empiricism asserts that knowledge comes from experience and making decisions based on what is observed. Pillars of Empiricism . Various practices exist to forecast progress, like burn-downs, burn-ups, or cumulative flows. While proven useful, these do not replace the importance of empiricism . In complex environments, what will happen is unknown. Only what has already happened may be used for forward-looking decision making. Each artifact contains a commitment to ensure it provides information that enhances transparency and focus against which progress can be measured: ● For the Product Backlog it is the Product Goal. ● For the Sprint Backlog it is the Sprint Goal. ● For the Increment it is the Definition of Done. These commitments exist to reinforce empiricism . The sum of the Increments is presented at the Sprint Review thus supporting empiricism .

High-Tech Yuga

Search This Blog