Skip to main content

Planned Value (PV) and Earned Value (EV)

 Budget at Completion (BAC) is the total estimated cost of a project after it's completed, including all allocated budgets and any remaining budget. It's a key factor in client project planning, helping to understand the total expected expenses. BAC is established early in the contract at the control account level and can be rolled up and reported at any level of the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS).

Planned Value = (Planned % Complete) X BAC (Budget at Completion)

Example:

Project cost (BAC): 100,000 USD

Project duration: 12 months

Time elapsed: 6 months

Percent complete: 50% (as per the schedule)

= 50% of BAC

= 50% of 100,000

= (50/100) X 100,000

= 50,000 USD

Therefore, the project’s Planned Value (PV) is 50,000 USD.


Earned Value = % of completed work X BAC (Budget at Completion)

Example:

Project cost (BAC): 100,000 USD

Project duration: 12 months

Time elapsed: 6 months

Percent complete: 40% (as per current status)

= 40% of BAC

= 40% of 100,000

= (40/100) X 100,000

= 40,000 USD

Therefore, the project’s Earned Value (EV) is 40,000 USD.

If the project going in same trend it will take 3 months additional timeline to complete the project.

 


There is no special formula to calculate the Actual Cost. It is an amount that has been spent, and you can find it easily in the question.

Example of Actual Cost (AC)

You have a project to be completed in 12 months. The budget of the project is 100,000 USD. 

Six months have passed, and 60,000 USD has been spent, but on closer review, you find that only 40% of the work has been completed so far.

The Actual Cost is the amount of money that you have spent so far. You have spent 60,000 USD on the project so far.

Hence,

The project’s Actual Cost is 60,000 USD. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a set of organizational and workflow patterns for implementing agile practices at an enterprise scale. The framework is a body of knowledge that includes structured guidance on roles and responsibilities, how to plan and manage the work, and values to uphold. Scrum is a simple, flexible approach to adopting Agile that's great for small teams. SAFe is an enterprise-wide Agile framework designed to help bring Agile beyond the team and into the company as a whole. Scaled Agile has built a comprehensive level that includes all the four layers called the team, program, large solutions, and portfolio level. 4 Layers: Portfolio - Strategy, Vision, Roadmap, Strategy goal, Decision making, Budget, Portfolio level metrics,  Program - Align multiple teams towards a common mission, Bring together all the Agile teams, transparency, collaboration, and synchronisation, Scrum of Scrums, Product Owners to define the overall vision. Large Solutions - archite

Risk Register

A project risk register is a tool project managers use to track and monitor any risks that might impact their projects. Risk management is a vital component of project management because it's how you proactively combat potential problems or setbacks. Risk Description Impact Risk Response Risk Level Risk Owner Automation Testing Software licence delay Delay in starting testing and project schedule impact As we have one licence. Planned to start automation testing in 2 shifts. Planned to get one more licence in 2 weeks’ time. High IT team Frequent Disruption in dependency API services Delay in development of integration and unit testing Dependency API service is down, and the team is working on resolving the issue. Continuously working with API team High External Team/ Project Manager There is chance of new requir

Lessons learned from sprint retrospective meeting

Scenario: Team Missed Sprint Goals Challenge: A development team consistently missed its sprint goals, leading to frustration and a drop in morale. Team members felt overwhelmed by the workload and struggled to communicate effectively. Retrospective Insights: During the retrospective, team members openly discussed their challenges and frustrations. They identified bottlenecks in communication, unclear priorities, and unrealistic expectations. The team realized that individual workloads were not evenly distributed, causing burnout for some members. Lessons Learned: Effective Communication Matters: The team recognized the importance of clear communication. They committed to regular stand-up meetings, where everyone shared progress, blockers, and priorities. Balancing Workloads: The retrospective highlighted the need to distribute tasks more evenly. They decided to monitor workloads and adjust assignments accordingly. Setting Realistic Goals: The team acknowledged that setting achievable