Skip to main content

PERT Estimation Technique Explained with Examples

Introduction:

Before the commencement of any project activity, accurate and meaningful time estimates are essential.

Project teams must come up with quality and accurate estimation techniques to ensure successful project execution. One such proven method is the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT).

 In this article, we’ll delve into PERT, complete with examples, to give you a clear understanding of what it entails. 

What is PERT?


PERT, fully known as the Program Evaluation and Review Technique, was created by the US Navy in the 1950s. 

Initially developed for a Ballistic Missile project involving thousands of contractors, PERT has since been used in many large projects. It is a tool used to handle big projects or programs that entail a series of activities. 

PERT helps analyze project activities, determine their sequential arrangement, and work out the required time to complete all tasks. The critical path, often known as PERT analysis, plays a crucial role in this methodology.

PERT and Project Management

PERT is particularly useful for research projects or programs that have not yet been implemented. When historical data is lacking, PERT steps in to provide deadlines for every task involved in a project. Here’s why PERT is valuable:

Handling the Unknown: When a project is being done for the first time, it’s challenging to determine the time for completion. PERT helps estimate the duration even in such cases.

Sequencing Activities: PERT guides teams on the sequence of all activities involved. It ensures that tasks are executed in the right order.

Budgeting and Resource Planning: By estimating the project’s duration, PERT helps ascertain the need for financial and human resources.

PERT Formula and Example:

The PERT formula is (O + (4 × M) + P) ÷ 6

Suppose we’re estimating the time for a software development task:

Optimistic Time: 2 days
Most Likely Time: 3 days
Pessimistic Time: 5 days

 PERT Estimate = (2 + 4 times 3 + 5) ÷ 6 = 3.33

Therefore, the PERT estimate for this activity is approximately 3.33 days.




Conclusion:
PERT provides a structured approach to estimating project timelines, especially when dealing with unknowns. By analyzing activities and creating a critical path, project teams can make informed decisions and achieve successful project outcomes.

Remember, accurate estimation is the foundation for effective project planning and execution!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a set of organizational and workflow patterns for implementing agile practices at an enterprise scale. The framework is a body of knowledge that includes structured guidance on roles and responsibilities, how to plan and manage the work, and values to uphold. Scrum is a simple, flexible approach to adopting Agile that's great for small teams. SAFe is an enterprise-wide Agile framework designed to help bring Agile beyond the team and into the company as a whole. Scaled Agile has built a comprehensive level that includes all the four layers called the team, program, large solutions, and portfolio level. 4 Layers: Portfolio - Strategy, Vision, Roadmap, Strategy goal, Decision making, Budget, Portfolio level metrics,  Program - Align multiple teams towards a common mission, Bring together all the Agile teams, transparency, collaboration, and synchronisation, Scrum of Scrums, Product Owners to define the overall vision. Large Solutions - archite

Risk Register

A project risk register is a tool project managers use to track and monitor any risks that might impact their projects. Risk management is a vital component of project management because it's how you proactively combat potential problems or setbacks. Risk Description Impact Risk Response Risk Level Risk Owner Automation Testing Software licence delay Delay in starting testing and project schedule impact As we have one licence. Planned to start automation testing in 2 shifts. Planned to get one more licence in 2 weeks’ time. High IT team Frequent Disruption in dependency API services Delay in development of integration and unit testing Dependency API service is down, and the team is working on resolving the issue. Continuously working with API team High External Team/ Project Manager There is chance of new requir

Lessons learned from sprint retrospective meeting

Scenario: Team Missed Sprint Goals Challenge: A development team consistently missed its sprint goals, leading to frustration and a drop in morale. Team members felt overwhelmed by the workload and struggled to communicate effectively. Retrospective Insights: During the retrospective, team members openly discussed their challenges and frustrations. They identified bottlenecks in communication, unclear priorities, and unrealistic expectations. The team realized that individual workloads were not evenly distributed, causing burnout for some members. Lessons Learned: Effective Communication Matters: The team recognized the importance of clear communication. They committed to regular stand-up meetings, where everyone shared progress, blockers, and priorities. Balancing Workloads: The retrospective highlighted the need to distribute tasks more evenly. They decided to monitor workloads and adjust assignments accordingly. Setting Realistic Goals: The team acknowledged that setting achievable