Skip to main content

PERT Estimation Technique Explained with Examples

Introduction:

Before the commencement of any project activity, accurate and meaningful time estimates are essential.

Project teams must come up with quality and accurate estimation techniques to ensure successful project execution. One such proven method is the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT).

 In this article, we’ll delve into PERT, complete with examples, to give you a clear understanding of what it entails. 

What is PERT?


PERT, fully known as the Program Evaluation and Review Technique, was created by the US Navy in the 1950s. 

Initially developed for a Ballistic Missile project involving thousands of contractors, PERT has since been used in many large projects. It is a tool used to handle big projects or programs that entail a series of activities. 

PERT helps analyze project activities, determine their sequential arrangement, and work out the required time to complete all tasks. The critical path, often known as PERT analysis, plays a crucial role in this methodology.

PERT and Project Management

PERT is particularly useful for research projects or programs that have not yet been implemented. When historical data is lacking, PERT steps in to provide deadlines for every task involved in a project. Here’s why PERT is valuable:

Handling the Unknown: When a project is being done for the first time, it’s challenging to determine the time for completion. PERT helps estimate the duration even in such cases.

Sequencing Activities: PERT guides teams on the sequence of all activities involved. It ensures that tasks are executed in the right order.

Budgeting and Resource Planning: By estimating the project’s duration, PERT helps ascertain the need for financial and human resources.

PERT Formula and Example:

The PERT formula is (O + (4 × M) + P) ÷ 6

Suppose we’re estimating the time for a software development task:

Optimistic Time: 2 days
Most Likely Time: 3 days
Pessimistic Time: 5 days

 PERT Estimate = (2 + 4 times 3 + 5) ÷ 6 = 3.33

Therefore, the PERT estimate for this activity is approximately 3.33 days.




Conclusion:
PERT provides a structured approach to estimating project timelines, especially when dealing with unknowns. By analyzing activities and creating a critical path, project teams can make informed decisions and achieve successful project outcomes.

Remember, accurate estimation is the foundation for effective project planning and execution!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) - Module 5 - Architecture Frameworks

Architecture Frameworks: An Architecture Framework is a theoretical structure that has the purpose of developing, executing, and maintaining an Enterprise Architecture. Advantages of EA framework: Simplify Breaks down areas of the business process Organise business components and create and identify relationships between business Determine the scope Customization in the existing framework Disadvantages of EA framework: Need to follow process Provides only direction and not information It's based on goal and objective Need creativity and proactive thinking Zachman Framework: The Zachman Framework is a widely used model in Enterprise Architecture (EA) that provides a structured way to classify and organize an organization's information infrastructure by defining different perspectives from various stakeholders, allowing for a holistic view of the enterprise and facilitating alignment between business needs and technology solutions; essentially acting as a template to organize arc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Daily Agile Scrum stand-up meeting guidelines

Followers of the Scrum method of project management will typically start their day with a " stand-up meeting ". In short, this is a quick daily meeting (30 minutes or less) where the participants share the answers to the three questions with each other: • What did I accomplish yesterday?  • What will I do today?  • What obstacles are impeding my progress?  Some people are talkative and tend to wander off into Story Telling .  Some people want to engage in Problem Solving immediately after hearing a problem. Meetings that take too long tend to have low energy and participants not directly related to a long discussion will tend to be distracted. These are the minimum number of questions that satisfy the goals of daily stand-ups. Other topics of discussion (e.g., design discussions, gossip, etc.) should be deferred until after the meeting.  Here are few tips for running a smooth daily meeting:  • Everyone should literally stand-up and no one should sit down ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Empiricism (Scrum)

Empiricism asserts that knowledge comes from experience and making decisions based on what is observed. Pillars of  Empiricism . Various practices exist to forecast progress, like burn-downs, burn-ups, or cumulative flows. While proven useful, these do not replace the importance of empiricism . In complex environments, what will happen is unknown. Only what has already happened may be used for forward-looking decision making. Each artifact contains a commitment to ensure it provides information that enhances transparency and focus against which progress can be measured: ● For the Product Backlog it is the Product Goal. ● For the Sprint Backlog it is the Sprint Goal. ● For the Increment it is the Definition of Done. These commitments exist to reinforce empiricism . The sum of the Increments is presented at the Sprint Review thus supporting empiricism .
Post a Comment
Read more