Velocity in Agile Projects

This article talks about calculating the team velocity of the agile project and addressing the benefit of the team velocity.

Velocity is an extremely simple, powerful method for accurately measuring the rate at which teams consistently deliver business value.

It is a measure of how much product backlog items the team can complete in the given amount of time.

It is used the compare the iterations for the given team on a given project, the note is only completed work counts for calculating the velocity.

Before you begin to calculate your team’s velocity, you will want to complete at least three to five sprints.

This allows for a team that is new to Agile project management to get used to the workflow and for any changes the team is going through to normalize.

Your velocity will fluctuate during these initial sprints but will stabilize after three or more have been completed.

Agile velocity formula:

Sprint 4:

Planned = 8 user stories * 3 story points = 24 story points

Actual = 4 user stories * 3 story points = 12 story points

Sprint 5:

Planned = 10 user stories * 5 story points = 50 story points

Actual = 7 user stories * 5 story points = 35 story points

Sprint 6:

Planned = 9 user stories * 4 story points = 36 story points

Actual = 7 user stories * 4 story points = 28 story points

Average sprint velocity = (sum of all sprint actual story points)/ number of sprints

Average sprint velocity = (12+35+28)/3 = 25

The average sprint velocity is 25, from the Sprint 7 Scrum owner can plan to complete 25 worth of user story point work.

Some of the benefits of velocities are:

Understanding about agile project performance
Reporting project progress, productivity, predictability
Finding pain points and improvement areas
Used as metrics
Calculating the rate at which the product moving forward
Provides vision what can be achieved in next release

Kindly note that keep on increasing the team velocity is not mean to maximize the productivity, when we focus more on increasing the team velocity the team may skip following standards, unit testing, bug-fixing. The goal is to maintain the optimum velocity over time, which takes account of following standards, quality and other factors.

Comments

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a set of organizational and workflow patterns for implementing agile practices at an enterprise scale. The framework is a body of knowledge that includes structured guidance on roles and responsibilities, how to plan and manage the work, and values to uphold. Scrum is a simple, flexible approach to adopting Agile that's great for small teams. SAFe is an enterprise-wide Agile framework designed to help bring Agile beyond the team and into the company as a whole. Scaled Agile has built a comprehensive level that includes all the four layers called the team, program, large solutions, and portfolio level. 4 Layers: Portfolio - Strategy, Vision, Roadmap, Strategy goal, Decision making, Budget, Portfolio level metrics, Program - Align multiple teams towards a common mission, Bring together all the Agile teams, transparency, collaboration, and synchronisation, Scrum of Scrums, Product Owners to define the overall vision. Large Solutions - archite

Risk Register

A project risk register is a tool project managers use to track and monitor any risks that might impact their projects. Risk management is a vital component of project management because it's how you proactively combat potential problems or setbacks. Risk Description Impact Risk Response Risk Level Risk Owner Automation Testing Software licence delay Delay in starting testing and project schedule impact As we have one licence. Planned to start automation testing in 2 shifts. Planned to get one more licence in 2 weeks’ time. High IT team Frequent Disruption in dependency API services Delay in development of integration and unit testing Dependency API service is down, and the team is working on resolving the issue. Continuously working with API team High External Team/ Project Manager There is chance of new requir

Lessons learned from sprint retrospective meeting

Scenario: Team Missed Sprint Goals Challenge: A development team consistently missed its sprint goals, leading to frustration and a drop in morale. Team members felt overwhelmed by the workload and struggled to communicate effectively. Retrospective Insights: During the retrospective, team members openly discussed their challenges and frustrations. They identified bottlenecks in communication, unclear priorities, and unrealistic expectations. The team realized that individual workloads were not evenly distributed, causing burnout for some members. Lessons Learned: Effective Communication Matters: The team recognized the importance of clear communication. They committed to regular stand-up meetings, where everyone shared progress, blockers, and priorities. Balancing Workloads: The retrospective highlighted the need to distribute tasks more evenly. They decided to monitor workloads and adjust assignments accordingly. Setting Realistic Goals: The team acknowledged that setting achievable

High-Tech Yuga

Search This Blog