Skip to main content

Application Modernization

Application modernization is the practice of updating older software for newer computing approaches, including newer languages, frameworks and infrastructure platforms. This practice is also sometimes called legacy modernization or legacy application modernization.

Four stages of Application modernization are:

Using of cloud software, digital apps and using of hybrid cloud platform to help organization to achieve greater ROI.

Rebuilding legacy applications as microservices, organization benefit to become a global market leader.

Modernizing applications is the process of taking existing legacy apps and updating their platform infrastructure, internal architecture, and/or features. Conversations about application modernization today are focused on bringing monolithic, on-premises applications into cloud architecture and release patterns. This entails using micro-services DevOps. 

Modernization is a key step in the process of moving from legacy applications to cloud-native ones.

When organization leverage legacy modernization, organization can take advantage of the benefits of the cloud, such as faster speed to market, scalability, agility, and lower costs.

When organization update application, they can release new features in a timely manner, give other services access to their old features, and move the application from physical servers to the cloud in order to increase performance. 

Today, keeping up with the latest technology is crucial for all businesses.

Updates and bug fixes can be rolled out in real-time to keep your application running smoothly.

Keeping software up-to-date is essential to simplifying operations and easing the burden on IT.

IT companies that still rely on outdated, more expensive legacy apps often have difficulties.

These include incompatibility issues, high maintenance costs, and a scarcity of developers. This is holding companies back from a complete digital transformation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a set of organizational and workflow patterns for implementing agile practices at an enterprise scale. The framework is a body of knowledge that includes structured guidance on roles and responsibilities, how to plan and manage the work, and values to uphold. Scrum is a simple, flexible approach to adopting Agile that's great for small teams. SAFe is an enterprise-wide Agile framework designed to help bring Agile beyond the team and into the company as a whole. Scaled Agile has built a comprehensive level that includes all the four layers called the team, program, large solutions, and portfolio level. 4 Layers: Portfolio - Strategy, Vision, Roadmap, Strategy goal, Decision making, Budget, Portfolio level metrics,  Program - Align multiple teams towards a common mission, Bring together all the Agile teams, transparency, collaboration, and synchronisation, Scrum of Scrums, Product Owners to define the overall vision. Large Solutions - archite

Risk Register

A project risk register is a tool project managers use to track and monitor any risks that might impact their projects. Risk management is a vital component of project management because it's how you proactively combat potential problems or setbacks. Risk Description Impact Risk Response Risk Level Risk Owner Automation Testing Software licence delay Delay in starting testing and project schedule impact As we have one licence. Planned to start automation testing in 2 shifts. Planned to get one more licence in 2 weeks’ time. High IT team Frequent Disruption in dependency API services Delay in development of integration and unit testing Dependency API service is down, and the team is working on resolving the issue. Continuously working with API team High External Team/ Project Manager There is chance of new requir

Lessons learned from sprint retrospective meeting

Scenario: Team Missed Sprint Goals Challenge: A development team consistently missed its sprint goals, leading to frustration and a drop in morale. Team members felt overwhelmed by the workload and struggled to communicate effectively. Retrospective Insights: During the retrospective, team members openly discussed their challenges and frustrations. They identified bottlenecks in communication, unclear priorities, and unrealistic expectations. The team realized that individual workloads were not evenly distributed, causing burnout for some members. Lessons Learned: Effective Communication Matters: The team recognized the importance of clear communication. They committed to regular stand-up meetings, where everyone shared progress, blockers, and priorities. Balancing Workloads: The retrospective highlighted the need to distribute tasks more evenly. They decided to monitor workloads and adjust assignments accordingly. Setting Realistic Goals: The team acknowledged that setting achievable