Skip to main content

Voice of the Customer (VoC) vs Voice of the Business (VoB)

 Tthe differences and strategic importance of Voice of Business (VoB) and Voice of Customer (VoC) in Lean Six Sigma:

Voice of Business vs Voice of Customer: Aligning Strategy with Value

In the world of Lean Six Sigma, success hinges on understanding and balancing two critical perspectives: the Voice of the Customer (VoC) and the Voice of the Business (VoB). While both are essential for driving sustainable growth and operational excellence, they represent distinct priorities that must be harmonized for optimal results.

🔊 Voice of the Customer (VoC)

Definition: VoC refers to the needs, expectations, preferences, and feedback of the customer—whether internal or external.

Focus Areas:

  • Product/service quality
  • Delivery timelines
  • Customer experience
  • Responsiveness and support

Methods of Capturing VoC:

  • Surveys and interviews
  • Focus groups
  • Customer complaints and feedback
  • Net Promoter Score (NPS)

Goal: To ensure that processes and outputs are aligned with what the customer truly values.

🏢 Voice of the Business (VoB)

Definition: VoB represents the strategic goals, financial objectives, and operational constraints of the organization.

Focus Areas:

  • Profitability and cost control
  • Efficiency and productivity
  • Compliance and risk management
  • Market share and growth

Sources of VoB:

  • Business strategy documents
  • Financial reports
  • Leadership directives
  • Regulatory requirements

Goal: To ensure that business decisions support long-term sustainability and competitive advantage.

⚖️ Balancing VoC and VoB

The real power of Lean Six Sigma lies in integrating VoC and VoB to create processes that are both customer-centric and business-efficient.

AspectVoice of Customer (VoC)Voice of Business (VoB)
PerspectiveExternal (customer-focused)Internal (business-focused)
PrioritySatisfaction and loyaltyProfitability and performance
MeasurementCustomer feedback, NPSKPIs, ROI, cost metrics
Risk of imbalanceOver-customization, inefficiencyCustomer dissatisfaction

✅ Why Both Matter

  • Ignoring VoC can lead to products that don’t meet market needs.
  • Ignoring VoB can result in unsustainable operations and financial losses.
  • Balancing both ensures that customer satisfaction drives business success.

🔍 Lean Six Sigma in Action

During a process improvement project:

  • VoC helps define Critical to Quality (CTQ) attributes.
  • VoB helps set performance targets and resource boundaries.
  • Together, they guide data-driven decisions that deliver value to both the customer and the business.

📌 Conclusion

VoC and VoB are not competing forces—they are complementary drivers of excellence. Lean Six Sigma practitioners must listen to both voices to design processes that delight customers while achieving strategic business goals.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) - Module 5 - Architecture Frameworks

Architecture Frameworks: An Architecture Framework is a theoretical structure that has the purpose of developing, executing, and maintaining an Enterprise Architecture. Advantages of EA framework: Simplify Breaks down areas of the business process Organise business components and create and identify relationships between business Determine the scope Customization in the existing framework Disadvantages of EA framework: Need to follow process Provides only direction and not information It's based on goal and objective Need creativity and proactive thinking Zachman Framework: The Zachman Framework is a widely used model in Enterprise Architecture (EA) that provides a structured way to classify and organize an organization's information infrastructure by defining different perspectives from various stakeholders, allowing for a holistic view of the enterprise and facilitating alignment between business needs and technology solutions; essentially acting as a template to organize arc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Daily Agile Scrum stand-up meeting guidelines

Followers of the Scrum method of project management will typically start their day with a " stand-up meeting ". In short, this is a quick daily meeting (30 minutes or less) where the participants share the answers to the three questions with each other: • What did I accomplish yesterday?  • What will I do today?  • What obstacles are impeding my progress?  Some people are talkative and tend to wander off into Story Telling .  Some people want to engage in Problem Solving immediately after hearing a problem. Meetings that take too long tend to have low energy and participants not directly related to a long discussion will tend to be distracted. These are the minimum number of questions that satisfy the goals of daily stand-ups. Other topics of discussion (e.g., design discussions, gossip, etc.) should be deferred until after the meeting.  Here are few tips for running a smooth daily meeting:  • Everyone should literally stand-up and no one should sit down ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Empiricism (Scrum)

Empiricism asserts that knowledge comes from experience and making decisions based on what is observed. Pillars of  Empiricism . Various practices exist to forecast progress, like burn-downs, burn-ups, or cumulative flows. While proven useful, these do not replace the importance of empiricism . In complex environments, what will happen is unknown. Only what has already happened may be used for forward-looking decision making. Each artifact contains a commitment to ensure it provides information that enhances transparency and focus against which progress can be measured: ● For the Product Backlog it is the Product Goal. ● For the Sprint Backlog it is the Sprint Goal. ● For the Increment it is the Definition of Done. These commitments exist to reinforce empiricism . The sum of the Increments is presented at the Sprint Review thus supporting empiricism .
Post a Comment
Read more