Skip to main content

Lean vs Six Sigma

Lean:

✓ Originated from Toyota 

✓ The Toyota Production System (TPS) is at the heart of Lean 

✓ The Lean methodology focuses on eliminating waste and smoothing the process flow 

✓ Lean is not about cutting costs. It is about removing waste without sacrificing quality


Waste is whatever slows the delivery process down

  • Reworking
  • Doing things customer doesn't want
  • Piles of materials not being worked on
  • Customers Queuing

Six Sigma:

 ✓ Developed by Motorola 

✓ To improve processes by reducing variation and defects 

✓ Many (but not all) of the tools are statistical in nature and 6 Sigma emphasises taking action based on fact rather than opinion or common belief 

✓ The ‘Sigma’ (σ) rating of a process can be used as an indicator of how many defective parts a process produces 

✓ 6 Sigma equates to 3.4 defects for each million opportunities (DPMO)





How they complements each other?


Key Principles:

General Topics:

How to make customer happy? (Voice of Customer - VOC)

1) Minimum variation

2) Quick delivery (Short Lead Time)

3) Reasonable Cost


 Six Sigma Belts:


The role of yellow belt:

✓ Understands the terminology and overall Lean 6 Sigma process 

✓ Is aware of the major tools and techniques embraced by Lean 6 Sigma 

✓ Understands the underlying philosophy of Lean and 6 Sigma 

✓ Acts as a team member under the direction of a Green Belt or Black Belt



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) - Module 5 - Architecture Frameworks

Architecture Frameworks: An Architecture Framework is a theoretical structure that has the purpose of developing, executing, and maintaining an Enterprise Architecture. Advantages of EA framework: Simplify Breaks down areas of the business process Organise business components and create and identify relationships between business Determine the scope Customization in the existing framework Disadvantages of EA framework: Need to follow process Provides only direction and not information It's based on goal and objective Need creativity and proactive thinking Zachman Framework: The Zachman Framework is a widely used model in Enterprise Architecture (EA) that provides a structured way to classify and organize an organization's information infrastructure by defining different perspectives from various stakeholders, allowing for a holistic view of the enterprise and facilitating alignment between business needs and technology solutions; essentially acting as a template to organize arc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe)

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) is a set of organizational and workflow patterns for implementing agile practices at an enterprise scale. The framework is a body of knowledge that includes structured guidance on roles and responsibilities, how to plan and manage the work, and values to uphold. Scrum is a simple, flexible approach to adopting Agile that's great for small teams. SAFe is an enterprise-wide Agile framework designed to help bring Agile beyond the team and into the company as a whole. Scaled Agile has built a comprehensive level that includes all the four layers called the team, program, large solutions, and portfolio level. 4 Layers: Portfolio - Strategy, Vision, Roadmap, Strategy goal, Decision making, Budget, Portfolio level metrics,  Program - Align multiple teams towards a common mission, Bring together all the Agile teams, transparency, collaboration, and synchronisation, Scrum of Scrums, Product Owners to define the overall vision. Large Solutions - ar...
Post a Comment
Read more

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) - Module 4 - Architecture Precursors

 Architecture Precursors: Precursors to modern Enterprise Architecture (EA) include early frameworks like IBM's Business Systems Planning (BSP), which focused on aligning business strategy with information systems, as well as other Information Systems (IS) architecture methodologies that emerged in the 1970s and 80s, emphasizing the connection between business processes and IT systems, laying the groundwork for the holistic view of an organization that EA represents today; the "Master Plan for Information Systems" by Evans and Hague is also considered a foundational concept in this area. Drivers: internal / external pressure enforce to change the system Aims & Directives: Aims:  Goals Objectives Requirements Directives: Principles (example: Principles can be associated with business, data, applications, infrastructure, or security) Policies (example: Members of the public have minimal access to data) Business Rules (example: A rule directs and restricts a procedure)
Post a Comment
Read more