Skip to main content

Validation Checkpoints for Scrum of Scrums

Here’s a structured list of Validation Checkpoints for Scrum of Scrums (SoS) to ensure it delivers value and aligns with scaled agile best practices:

 Validation Checkpoints for Scrum of Scrums

  1. Progress Alignment

  • Are all teams aligned with the Sprint Goals?

  • What is the action plan for Spill over stories?

  • Is progress mapped against Epic/Release milestones?

  • Are team velocities stable, and any major deviations explained?


  1. Dependencies

  • Are cross-team dependencies and external dependencies are identified clearly?

  • Are dependency owners assigned and tracked?

  • Are upcoming dependencies planned (not last-minute surprises)?


  1. Blockers & Risks

  • Are there any blockers beyond team control?

  • Are escalations being addressed at the right level (Scrum Master vs Program)?

  • Are risks logged, assessed, and mitigated?


  1. Quality & Defects

  • Are defect trends (open/closed rate, severity) under control?

  • Is regression/integration testing on track?


  1. Delivery Readiness

  • Is the integration plan between teams clear and realistic?

  • Is the demo to Product team (end of sprint) prepared?

  • Any concerns with meeting release dates or milestones?


  1. Collaboration & Communication

  • Are teams sharing knowledge?

  • Are issues parked for deep-dive offline discussions?

  • Is there transparency in reporting blockers?


  1. Process Tracking

  • Perform thorough impact analysis before implementing code changes.

  • Developers to validate functional logic with SMEs before implementation

  • Leverage peer reviews more rigorously, especially for critical/shared components

  • Ensure developers write and execute unit tests

  • Reduce the Bug Sub Task % in the upcoming release.

  • Reduce the Bug Reopened % in the upcoming release.

  • Follow coding best practices and use static code analysis tools

  • Is Retrospective conducted for last sprints, Is RCA identified for the blockers and lessons are implemented?


  1. Action Tracking

  • Were last SoS action items closed?

  • Are new actions assigned, and time-bound?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Delivering a project within budget

 Here are some tips for delivering a project within budget: Set a realistic budget Define the project's scope and necessary resources, and create a budget that's realistic. Cost estimate Segment the project into smaller tasks and milestones to plan how to use resources and provide clarity. Divide the project plan Break down the project into tasks to avoid late deliverables and over-budget projects. Monitor progress Regularly track the project's progress to identify and prevent cost overruns. Use progress reports to compare actual costs to the budget. Anticipate and revise changes Communicate with stakeholders to identify and assess risks, and assign owners to each risk. Consider different scenarios Estimation can be difficult for complex projects with many potential outcomes. Tracking: Tracking time spent on tasks, Tracking expenses per project, and Using project management software. Use Historical Data Your project is likely not the first to try and accomplish a specific o...

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) - Module 5 - Architecture Frameworks

Architecture Frameworks: An Architecture Framework is a theoretical structure that has the purpose of developing, executing, and maintaining an Enterprise Architecture. Advantages of EA framework: Simplify Breaks down areas of the business process Organise business components and create and identify relationships between business Determine the scope Customization in the existing framework Disadvantages of EA framework: Need to follow process Provides only direction and not information It's based on goal and objective Need creativity and proactive thinking Zachman Framework: The Zachman Framework is a widely used model in Enterprise Architecture (EA) that provides a structured way to classify and organize an organization's information infrastructure by defining different perspectives from various stakeholders, allowing for a holistic view of the enterprise and facilitating alignment between business needs and technology solutions; essentially acting as a template to organize arc...

Empiricism (Scrum)

Empiricism asserts that knowledge comes from experience and making decisions based on what is observed. Pillars of  Empiricism . Various practices exist to forecast progress, like burn-downs, burn-ups, or cumulative flows. While proven useful, these do not replace the importance of empiricism . In complex environments, what will happen is unknown. Only what has already happened may be used for forward-looking decision making. Each artifact contains a commitment to ensure it provides information that enhances transparency and focus against which progress can be measured: ● For the Product Backlog it is the Product Goal. ● For the Sprint Backlog it is the Sprint Goal. ● For the Increment it is the Definition of Done. These commitments exist to reinforce empiricism . The sum of the Increments is presented at the Sprint Review thus supporting empiricism .