Agile Programme framework does not mandate any specific Agile method for running projects – merely a framework where any method can be incorporated at the project / initiative level.
Benefits management process is integrated throughout the
lifecycle
Feasibility and foundations are sequential
foundations is likely to be run as a iterative and incremental
project – with defined time boxes and a minimum defined set of outputs to be
produced.
Capability evolutions phase
areas capability enablement and benefits realisation
these
are potentially overlapping phases.
Constantly providing feedback – as soon as a capability is delivered this can
enable some formal benefits realisation.
Pre-programme
In most orgs programmes exist as part of a
portfolio of other programmes or projects.
Pre-programme
formalises a proposal and places it in context of other work to be carried out.
Objectives:
1.
To describe
business transformation to be carried out
2.
Identify the business programme owner and business change owners
3.
Confirm vision aligns to strategy
4.
Scope plan and resource the
feasibility phase
5.
To justify if the programme is worth investigating
Important point only - EDUF (Enough Design Up Front) done here
Programme Feasibility
Need to have a programme vision that is
clear and the strategy is aligned to the business and benefits – being cost
effective.
Key point is the programme should be
included in the organisations portfolio on initiatives
Objectives:
- 1.
Confirm programme is consistent
with business strategy
- 2.
Can be achieved
- 3.
To refine the outline vision
of the programme
- 4.
High level outline of benefits
- 5.
Outline cost of the programme
- 6.
Consider the future state
of the organisation (possible interim states)
- 7.
Confirm if a programme structure
is necessary
- 8.
Develop foundations plan – along with key
participants
- 9. Develop
outline governance strategy
- 10.
Assess whether the organisation
is ready to use Agile techniques on the programme
Preconditions
1.
Authorisation has been granted
to move into feasibility
2.
Business programme owner has
been identified and can participate in the feasibility investigations
Keep it short to principally justify the
programmes inclusion in the orgs portfolio
Foundations
Aim is to establish firm foundations for
the programme – ensure programme meets sufficient benefit è worthwhile investment.
Key areas addressed are:
-
I.
Vision
-
II.
Design
-
III.
Architecture
-
IV.
Governance
-
V.
Culture
-
VI.
Communication
Firm
foundations include:
1.
A confirmed vision statement
2. Business
case
3. Business
architectural model (BAM)
4. Prioritised
business benefits
5.
The definition of prioritised,
incremental capability enablement
6. Programme
management structure
7.
Programme organisation
including roles and responsibilities
8.
Stakeholder engagement strategy
9.
Communication plans
10.
High level plans including road map
and benefit
realisation plans
The foundations phase does not plan ALL
tranches and projects in detail.
It’s complete when there is sufficient
information to be able to enter the first tranche and to approve making this
step.
Planning
the first tranche:
Need to
a.
Identify and plan the projects /
initiatives that will deliver the outputs to deliver the
capabilities
b.
Identify and plan the activities
to enable delivery of the capabilities
Projects CAN be sequential OR overlapping è project planning is limited to:
I.
High level scope of each
project in relation to the programme business case
II.
Define project
interdependencies
III.
Outline budget for each project
IV.
Start end dates for each
project
Objectives
of foundations
I.
Baseline vision of programme
II.
Create the BAM
III.
Define road map for realising
vision and developing the BAM
IV.
Define high level benefits and
capabilities
V.
Confirm the programme business
case
VI.
Establish governance model è must be agile
VII.
Develop a programme plan è detailed first tranche è others in
outline è comms plan
VIII.
Describes how to assess and
manage risks
IX.
Identify key stake holders –
develop stakeholder engagement strategy
X.
Obtain approval to move into
first tranche è gain funding for at least first tranche
Preconditions
I.
Agreement that the programme
should be in the business portfolio
II.
Business Programme Owner
(similar to Sponsor in AgilePM) is in place
III.
Access to innovative thinkers
Foundations is considered a project in its own right
use many / all agile techniques
Follow EDUF
MUST consider the impacts of change
responsibility remains with Business change owners
appropriate to at least consider specific changes
Capability Evolution
Works iteratively and incrementally
Iteratively è
development based on constant review converging on the right solution
Incrementally è each
tranche delivers a set of capabilities that move the organisation closer to its
new state
Objectives
1.
Plan / initiate / execute
projects to deliver capability
2.
Measure benefits along the way
Preconditions
Foundation products have been completed and
agreed
Tranche plan has been agreed for this
tranche
Overlapping
tranches
May need to overlap tranches è when neither necessary nor advisable to sequence
Overlapping tranches need to be self
consistent and non reliant on another tranche
Tranches delivering different capabilities often run in
parallel
Processes
1.
Capability enablement
2.
Benefit realisation
1. Capability enablement
To drive the creation / development /
enablement of capabilities within a tranche
4
components
I.
Prepare for capability development and enablement
a.
Tranche is considered and
checked to:
i.
All stakeholders understand
purpose of tranche
ii.
All stakeholders understand
their roles / responsibilities
iii.
Communication activities are
clear and prepared
iv.
Project managers + teams are
identified and briefed
v.
ENABLEMENT teams are ready to
start
vi.
Projects and enablement
activities are clearly defined
II.
Execute projects
a.
Detailed project planning
happens during PROJECT EXECUTION
b.
Projects executed to deliver
outputs è further projects could be identified è this
will lead to a review of the Programme and tranche plan
c.
Enablement activities can also
commence è so long as not dependent on the project output
III.
Enablement capabilities
a.
Consolidate project outputs è assemble
b.
Change / develop new processes è drive efficiency
c.
Instigate relevant change
initiatives within the organisation
IV.
Retrospective
a. Occurs only on enablement of capability è feedback used to update tranche plan è could result in more projects or negating some projects. If sufficient work has been done move into the tranche review
2. Benefit realisation
Is reliant on capability evolution.
Many enablement activities within
capability enablement are driven by the benefits realisation plan è this
defines how the benefits in the PRIORITISED BENEFITS DEFINITION will accrue as
capabilities are enabled
Benefits realisation process can commence
as soon as capability is identified è i.e.
measuring the improvements gained so far through delivery of an output.
Main activities in benefits realisation
during capability evolution are:
I.
Baseline measurement
prior to capability enablement
II.
Incremental measurement following capability enablement è show
benefit evolution
III.
Update benefit assessment è show current state of benefit
IV.
Potential update to benefit realisation plan/
prioritised benefits definition and other programme
foundation products as necessary
Points
to consider
Always use experts
Use retrospectives even after only partial
project deployments
There needs to tranche flexibility in the
definition of planning tranches è must never
impose rigidity that could stifle the autonomy of Agile
Tranche review
Commences once considered sufficient
capability achieved.
Key è
confirms the viability of continuation
Confirms any changes needed to plans and
other programme foundation documents
Each tranche has its own review
Tranches in parallel or overlapping è remember capabilities being delivered have been identified as
neither overlapping nor interdependent è
meaning NO dependency between tranches
Best practise suggests è if a tranche review identifies a change to programme foundation
products è the overlapping tranche should be reviewed to ensure its validity è may require replanning
Objectives:
I.
Determine sufficient capability
è tranche complete?
II.
Has sufficient capability been
delivered to determine if programme is complete?
III.
To plan the next tranche
IV.
Review the programme and update
plans and other foundation products as necessary
V.
Review lessons and manage
appropriately
Preconditions
Sufficient capabilities have been enabled
to allow the tranche to be deemed complete
Points
to consider
Tranche review may deem PROGRAMME complete
even with outstanding future tranches
Future plans and foundation documents WILL
evolve as more becomes known from tranches
Lessons learned may require governance
structures / processes to be amended
Care in planning tranches running in
parallel
Benefits Management
Used to ensure optimum benefits are being
realised from the enabled capabilities è ASAP
Monitors benefit accruals throughout the
programme
Benefit management is iterative and
incremental
Where does benefit management typically
take place?
I.
Programme feasibility è identifies definition / prioritisation of benefits and benefit
planning
II.
Benefit planning baselined
during foundations
III.
Benefit realisation mainly
occurs in capability evolution
IV.
Future plans for continued benefits
assessment take place during Programme Closure
Objectives
I.
To gain optimum benefits from
capabilities
II.
Monitor benefit accrual
III.
Prove benefits through measurement
IV.
Ensure any future benefit
management activities are owned by business change owner
Preconditions
I.
Capabilities have been enabled
II.
Business change owners are
committed
Points
to consider
Use early benefit indicators to help map
the future ones
Some benefits will only be realised post
programme è process therefore must carry on
Programme Close
Objectives
-
I.
Confirm sufficient capability has been delivered
-
II.
Close the programme
-
III.
Gather any lessons
-
IV.
Review programme against it vision / business case
Preconditions
Sufficient capability has been achieved
Points
to consider
BCO’s are committed ongoing for benefit realisation
The business strategy definers within the
org need to be informed of closure and may need to approve its closure
Programmes are not formally recognised as
closed until the final project or enablement activity is completed è but team involvement may reduce in the later stages
Comments
Post a Comment