Skip to main content

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) : Module 14 - The Architecture Content Framework

The Architecture Content Framework:

  1. The Content Framework is an integral part of the Architecture Content Framework (ACF), which is a structured approach to organising and managing enterprise architecture content.
  2. The Content Framework provides a standardised model for describing the types of information that are essential to enterprise architecture.
  3. There are three key components of the Content Framework: the Content Metamodel, the Content Taxonomy, and Content Views.
  4. The Content Metamodel defines the essential types of information that an enterprise architecture should capture, such as business processes, applications, data models, and technology infrastructure.
  5. It also defines the relationships between these different types of information, which helps stakeholders understand how they interrelate.
  6. The Content Taxonomy is a hierarchical classification system that organises the information in the Content Metamodel.
  7. It provides a standardised way of categorising the different types of information, making it easier to manage and locate the content.
  8. Content Views are tailored perspectives on the Content Metamodel that align with the requirements of various stakeholders.
  9. For instance, a business stakeholder might need a high level view of the business processes and applications, while a technical stakeholder might need a more detailed view of the technology infrastructure.
  10. Content Views allow stakeholders to concentrate on the information that is most relevant to their needs.
Benefits of A Content Framework:
  1. Standardisation
  2. Efficiency
  3. Agility
  4. Clarity
  5. Stakeholder Alignment

TOGAF ADM and Architecture Content Framework:


The Architecture Content Framework (ACF) is a model that describes the types of architectural work products in the TOGAF framework for enterprise architecture: 
Purpose
  • The ACF provides a structured approach for describing and documenting architectural work products. It's intended to: 
  • Drive consistency in the outputs created by the Architecture Development Method (ADM) 
  • Define, structure, and present major work products consistently 
  • Be used as a stand-alone framework for architecture within an enterprise 
Categories
The ACF uses three categories to describe architectural work products: 
  • Deliverables: Work products that are formally reviewed and approved by stakeholders 
  • Artifacts: Architectural work products that describe an aspect of the architecture 
  • Building blocks: Reusable components of enterprise capability that can be combined to deliver architectures and solutions 
Elements
The ACF consists of three main elements: 
  • Content metamodel: Defines the types of architecture artifacts, their relationships, and their attributes 
  • Content viewpoints: Provide a way to present the architecture content to different audiences and purposes 
  • Content governance: Establishes the roles, responsibilities, and processes for creating, reviewing, and approving the architecture content

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Certified Enterprise Architect Professional (CEAP) - Module 5 - Architecture Frameworks

Architecture Frameworks: An Architecture Framework is a theoretical structure that has the purpose of developing, executing, and maintaining an Enterprise Architecture. Advantages of EA framework: Simplify Breaks down areas of the business process Organise business components and create and identify relationships between business Determine the scope Customization in the existing framework Disadvantages of EA framework: Need to follow process Provides only direction and not information It's based on goal and objective Need creativity and proactive thinking Zachman Framework: The Zachman Framework is a widely used model in Enterprise Architecture (EA) that provides a structured way to classify and organize an organization's information infrastructure by defining different perspectives from various stakeholders, allowing for a holistic view of the enterprise and facilitating alignment between business needs and technology solutions; essentially acting as a template to organize arc...

Daily Agile Scrum stand-up meeting guidelines

Followers of the Scrum method of project management will typically start their day with a " stand-up meeting ". In short, this is a quick daily meeting (30 minutes or less) where the participants share the answers to the three questions with each other: • What did I accomplish yesterday?  • What will I do today?  • What obstacles are impeding my progress?  Some people are talkative and tend to wander off into Story Telling .  Some people want to engage in Problem Solving immediately after hearing a problem. Meetings that take too long tend to have low energy and participants not directly related to a long discussion will tend to be distracted. These are the minimum number of questions that satisfy the goals of daily stand-ups. Other topics of discussion (e.g., design discussions, gossip, etc.) should be deferred until after the meeting.  Here are few tips for running a smooth daily meeting:  • Everyone should literally stand-up and no one should sit down ...

Empiricism (Scrum)

Empiricism asserts that knowledge comes from experience and making decisions based on what is observed. Pillars of  Empiricism . Various practices exist to forecast progress, like burn-downs, burn-ups, or cumulative flows. While proven useful, these do not replace the importance of empiricism . In complex environments, what will happen is unknown. Only what has already happened may be used for forward-looking decision making. Each artifact contains a commitment to ensure it provides information that enhances transparency and focus against which progress can be measured: ● For the Product Backlog it is the Product Goal. ● For the Sprint Backlog it is the Sprint Goal. ● For the Increment it is the Definition of Done. These commitments exist to reinforce empiricism . The sum of the Increments is presented at the Sprint Review thus supporting empiricism .